
Imagine the following hypothetical situation. An airplane flies in a straight line from point A to point
B and then flies back in a straight line from point B to point A. The airplane maintains a constant
engine speed for the entire flight and there is no wind.
At the same constant
engine speed, would the travel time for the round trip increase, decrease,
or stay the same if instead there was a constant wind that blew from A to B the entire time? Note that
engine speed is not the same as the
total speed of the airplane which is a combination
of engine speed and wind speed etc.
ANSWER:
The travel time for a round trip will be greater.
EXPLANATION: It might seem that the travel time should be the same as the wind
increases the total speed of the airplane from point A to point B and decreases the total speed of the
airplane from point B to point A by the same amount. This is true, but the airplane benefits from the
speed boost from the wind from point A to point B for a shorter amount of time and is hindered by the
wind (blowing in the opposite direction) from point B to point A for a longer amount of time. If you're
not convinced, imagine a wind speed that is equivalent to the engine speed of the airplane. The airplane
would travel at double it's speed from point A to point B but would not move at all from point B to
point A.
Do you have a
suggestion for this puzzle (e.g. something that should
be mentioned/clarified in the question or solution, bug, typo, etc.)?